Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Rubin blues harp's avatar

I am as suspicious of "prestige by association " -which I've jokingly referred to as "rock & roll McCarthyism " as I am of guilt by association. I'm also against the opposite of ad hominem attacks -the idea that someone's life (or viewpoint ) validates or ensures the value of their work ... I'm trying to keep everything extraneous to the work itself ,outside of my judgement of the work When bands or authors become too cool this becomes more difficult -but more necessary . Is it the thing itself that's inspiring - e.g.masterworks like Howl -or is it the artist's aspirations, and the sense of identity that being a fan of or hip to this particular author/"subculture" generates in the listener /reader. I don't think artists should be judged on on their aspirations -and I don't think their aspirations should be allowed to intrude upon the judgements-but that the judgements should be made on "the things themselves" -what has actually been created ,achieved ...(Of course there's no need to make judgements if you're not a critic)

Expand full comment
Dave pearen's avatar

Fantastic review

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts