Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Rubin blues harp's avatar

An organization striving for "beat' prestige by attempting to add Dylan ...there's something fundamentally indecent about that... considering that the spirit of rebellion , anarchy,

and anti-institutionalism animated the Beats and early Dylan there's an absurdity and a wrong-headedness about the whole project of anointing beat"laureates" that somehow violates the existential purity of what Ginsberg et al.did back then.One driving force behind Dylan's shape shifting is the recognition that fame, honors,official recognitions ,and especially labels are a trap that can interfere and inhibit the artist/creator. Give the founder points for honesty though-She says in her mission statement that she founded this organization because she failed in establishing herself as a poet through the usual corrupt channels. But why create a farcical replica of those structures?... I respect her ambition and drive but I suspect my respect when I remember

Yeats -"The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity".

Expand full comment
Simon Warner's avatar

I suppose we are back in Groucho Marx territory: ‘I wouldn’t be a member of any club that would have me!’ But Dylan, did, after all, accept a Nobel Prize after a judicious pause. I do agree that we don’t associate the Beats with organised bureaucracies but, for me, I just enjoy the crossovers that can arise with that literary community of writers as a linking fulcrum. Like Ed Ruscha, Pop artist and Kerouac fan, doing the Beatles’ ‘Now and Then’ cover.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts