Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Rubin blues harp's avatar

Fascinating array of comments and speculation.Most surprising to me - Charlie Plymell's dismissal of Dylan -which may very well be tongue in cheek -but knowing of Kerouac's & Corso's fundamental lack of interest/hostility to rock & roll ,Plymell's comment on Dylan may reflect a real hostility to Dylan. Many writers ,I think felt that between rock & roll, psychedelics & McCluhan's assault on "print culture",the world spearheaded by young rockers & academics like Richard Poirier seeking to appear eminently cool to their students, was turning against Literature. As ,unfortunately has pretty much proven to be the case in my view...

I expect that fairly soon ,if there is not one already out there ,there will be a photo-shopped photo of all the Beat superstars -and only the superstars-(whom to include will inevitably become a matter of dispute) -and that the photoshopped picture will be a last hurrah ,(and an introduction to some of course).

Would Dylan have found his way to surrealistic imagery without the Beats ? I think through his reading of Rimbaud and Dylan Thomas he probably would have . But without the Beats would millions and millions of young people found their way to Blonde On Blonde -probably not.

The Free form Jazz played with rock instruments by rock musicians with Beat,or neo-Beat poetry recited/half sung/half spoken -over the music in the tradition of Rexroth's & Ferlinghetti's collaboration with jazz musicians at the Celler seems to me to be the pureist form of the influence of the Beats on Rock & Roll-if the least popular and commercially successful. Spoken Word Rock ,I call it...

Sean H's avatar

It's understandable why Bob was reluctant to pose with those Beat fellows and I cant imagine Blond on Blonde with any other imagery

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?